By on October 7, 2019

2019 Volvo Cars USA full lineup - Image: Volvo

Volvo’s relationship with its Chinese parent is about to grow even closer. The Swedish car maker and its parent company, Geely, proposes to put an end to separate engine development, with engineering teams from both companies tasked with building common powerplants for all marques in Geely’s broad orbit.

For Volvo, the move to a new standalone business for its internal combustion engines would be beneficial, given its plan for the brand’s future.

“The planned new business would represent a significant industrial collaboration between Volvo Cars and Geely with substantial operational, industrial and financial synergies,” the companies said in a release.

Within a handful of years, the automakers envision ICE and hybrid powerplants rolling out of the new company, headed for Geely, Volvo, Proton, Lynk&Co and Lotus models. Volvo Cars, in turn, will dive deep into electrification, offering up fully electric versions of its existing lineup. The first of those vehicles, the XC40 EV, was revealed late last month ahead of a formal introduction in October.

The companies say the new unit will employ “approximately 3,000 employees from Volvo Cars and around 5,000 employees from Geely’s combustion engine operations including research and development, procurement, manufacturing, IT and finance functions.” Neither expect any job losses out of the setup.

“Hybrid cars need the best internal combustion engines. This new unit will have the resources, scale and expertise to develop these powertrains cost efficiently,” said Volvo Cars CEO Håkan Samuelsson.

The proposal would first have to meet the approval of labor unions, board members, and regulators before being put into effect.

[Image: Volvo Cars]

Recommended

17 Comments on “Volvo and Parent Geely Seek to End Separate Engine Development...”


  • avatar
    akear

    Sweden no longer has an auto industry. At least America still has Tesla, GM, and Ford.

  • avatar
    dukeisduke

    I thought that Volo’s plan was to introduce a new EV model per year, and phase out ICE cars in the next few years.

  • avatar
    Whatnext

    I really liked the Volvo S90 when I saw it at the auto show. Large, spacious and elegant, everything a luxury sedan should be. Then I saw that it was Made in China and it instantly fell off my shopping list.

    • 0 avatar
      Garrett

      I prefer the Made in Sweden Volvos, but:

      1) Volvo owns the factory
      2) Volvo employs the people working there
      3) Volvo engineers the vehicles, regardless of where they are made
      4) Volvo backs the cars with the same warranty, etc.

      In my mind, the big issue I have is that if the cars are not made in Sweden, there needs to be a discount to reflect the savings.

      At the same time, you have Audi building vehicles in Mexico. I hold them to the same standard here.

      I’m willing to pay a premium for work done in a country with strong worker and environmental protections. That premium should not be baked into the price if it is built elsewhere.

      For the right price, you could get me into a Volvo made in China. You could not do that with a car that was made by a Chinese company that I have no reason to trust.

      • 0 avatar
        volvoguyincanada

        Yes, China is not a pleasant county. But your computer, phone, and a lot of your household items were probably made in China. Where do we draw the line – cars? I have yet to hear of any mechanical issues affecting the models assembled in China.

        My Volvo was made in Torslanda, Sweden. It feels like a tank. I haven’t had a chance to drive the made in China models yet.

        • 0 avatar
          Carrera

          When, when you pay $60,000 for a car Made in China, it is easy to draw the line. If you pay 9,99 for a can opener and 7.50 for a small taster..who cares?
          I even try to minimize it with phones. I buy a cheap Chinese Motorola good for 1,5-2 years. I draw the line at 1200 Chinese Iphones

          • 0 avatar
            volvoguyincanada

            That is a really good point, it is a ton of money to spend. My iPhone is a great build quality .. but in a few years I will dispose of it. Cars are built to last much longer than a few years.

          • 0 avatar
            Sceptic

            Agree with Carrera. I liked the Made in China S90 in the showroom. Very well made interior. Quality stuff. But $56K sticker was ridiculous. That would be decent value at $30K. Maybe even $35 for some. But no way dealer would drop $20K off.

          • 0 avatar
            DenverMike

            With vehicles, it’s not profit margin (or lack of) that sets the retail price.

            Build quality doesn’t necessarily suffer by 3rd World (sweatshop) manufacturing, although any part made of Chinese steel will likely wear out or break sooner.

  • avatar
    CKNSLS Sierra SLT

    (dated 2017) General Motors produces the Buick Envision exclusively at a factory in Shanghai, mainly for the Chinese market. About 32,000 of the vehicles, which sell at a base price of $34,065, have been sold in the US since the company introduced the compact SUV to the US market last summer.

    If I am not mistaken-this is Buick’s biggest selling model in the U.S. And we know other models come from here as well.

    BTW-Geely is the Chinese automaker who has been saying for sometime they are eventually coming to the U.S.

    Bottom line-there are already major bucks being spent on Chinese made cars in this market.

    • 0 avatar
      redapple

      CKNSLEJRKHSGNSD;

      No.
      Envision is not a best seller.
      It is a very poor seller.

      China is an evil empire. Avoid buying their crap.

      • 0 avatar
        CKNSLS Sierra SLT

        redapple-I didn’t say Encore was a best seller. I said it is one of Buick’s best seller-which it is.

        Country of origin has absolutely zero bearing on my purchase decisions.

        Quit twisting my statements around to suit your anti China bias.

        • 0 avatar
          olivebranch2006

          “Anti China bias” is pretty valid based on how many millions of Chinese have been murdered under an oppressive communist dictatorship. They are no better than what happened under Stalin.

        • 0 avatar
          Hummer

          “ Quit twisting my statements around to suit your anti China bias.”

          What? Is your whole comment sarcasm? Being against a ruthless communist government that is best known for killing dissenters, tracking the lives of everyone, and stealing US secrets and US technology makes one biased? It would be at the benefit of everyone on this earth if every country stopped trade with China and let it collapse, as far as I’m concerned it’s the biggest threat to America and the freedom loving democratic countries around this world.

          Country of origin should be your first concern buying a vehicle if there are quality vehicles made within your countries borders that suits your needs; particularly when the vehicle you do buy is bought from a 3rd or 2nd world country that directly hurts your own country.

  • avatar
    jjf

    As a 9 year soon to be ex Volvo owner this wouldn’t bother me. Our xc70 needed a new engine at 40K miles so the bar is low as far as I am concerned. We purchased our Swedish made car right after Geely bought them, so it is really Ford managed engineering at its finest. Despite this and other defects my wife was quite a fan of the brand and had no issue buying a made in China car. We planned to replace the car with an XC60 do so right until she actually looked at the car in person. The styling inside and out did not agree with her and we walked out after 5 minutes and never looked back. We ended up with a base BMW X3 and couldn’t be happier. Styling, design and engineering matter more than brand identity or where the car is made.

    • 0 avatar
      Garrett

      Different strokes for different folks!

      We went from a first gen to second gen XC60. Happy with the new one. More power from T6 and 20% observed improvement in MPG.

      Meanwhile I’ve never gotten to a place where I like the BMW X series. BMW 3 series is fine enough, but from everything I’ve read, the Giulia is a far better car for driving enjoyment.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Hummer: “ Quit twisting my statements around to suit your anti China bias.” What? Is your whole comment sarcasm?...
  • thejohnnycanuck: It did. The base Z has 332 and the Nismo has 350.
  • slavuta: Without NISMO it is impossible even to look at Nissan
  • SPPPP: This series is fun; I look forward to the next installment.
  • PrincipalDan: I meant that the 4.3 makes its peak torque at a lower RPM than the 3.6.

New Car Research

Staff

  • Contributors

  • Timothy Cain, Canada
  • Matthew Guy, Canada
  • Ronnie Schreiber, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States
  • Mark Baruth, United States
  • Moderators

  • Adam Tonge, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States
ковре купить украина.
instaforex отзывы
Terms of Use
Copyright
Privacy Policy